In public discourse, much has been
made about the importance of whistleblowing and leaks in uncovering illegal actions
within the government. Leakers and whistleblowers are usually praised for their
selflessness, sacrifice, and patriotism; paragons of virtue who made tough
decisions and placed the good of their country above their safety, comfort, or ideology. The presidency
of Donald Trump has given rise to an unprecedented level of leaks and
whistleblowing which has been gleefully processed by the media and consumed by
many in America. Leaking has become so frequent that White House meetings
called about leaking start by acknowledging that the
meeting decrying leaking will itself be leaked. While good arguments can be
made about the importance of the whistleblower on Ukraine, it would be foolish
to not acknowledge that many of the leaks in the administration are a result of
bureaucratic resistance to President Trump and petty political differences, not
patriotism.
Examples of leaks reflecting
bureaucratic resistance and individual distaste for President Trump abound and
include the leaking and weaponizing of the President’s schedule, the President’s phone calls with the leaders of Mexico and Canada, insulting remarks about SenatorJohn McCain during a White House meeting, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly calling the President an “idiot” during a meeting, President Trump calling African countries “shitholes”, internal documents about vetting senior officials, and many more. These leaks are done to denigrate the President and
his staff, derail his policies, and sow discord in Washington.
This sort of “resistance”
to the President amounts to little more than petty gossip rather than evidence
of criminality or wrongdoing. There can be no mistaking the intentions of these
leaks: government employees dislike the President and choose to use their
privileged position to disclose confidential information with the hopes of embarrassing
and obstructing the President. These leaks are done to craft a narrative of an
incompetent and chaotic White House, with a leader unequal to the requirements
of the presidency. Government employees have a responsibility to serve the
elected leaders of our country and carry out their policies, barring an illegal
order. Leaking, resisting, and slow rolling a President whose policies you
dislike is not patriotism but selfishness and does a disservice to our country
and its citizenry. An important consideration to be made is that the next
President may be one that you like and whose policies you want to see enacted.
Would you still find the same sort of petty leaking listed above to be patriotic?
No comments:
Post a Comment