For all those in favor, the matter is simply a question of
civil rights. They consider the matter a discrimination issue. To the argument
that women are not as physically strong or as capable, they maintain that they
can meet the same physical training standards as men. Not to mention the fact
that many women have already been engaged in combat operations in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
For those who oppose, the list of objections is much longer.
While women may be able to meet the same standards, there are very few who do,
and those standards have so far been relaxed for women. Studies suggest that
even training women at the same levels for men will dramatically increase the
injury rate for women. There is also the possibility that men will be impaired
psychologically and emotionally from doing their jobs in a combat situation
when women are involved. Whether instinctual or taught, men have an ingrained
sense to protect women from harm. Sexual assault within the armed services is
currently increasing. Allowing women in combat would likely exacerbate the
problem. Even for women who serve in areas of deplorable conditions, much less
in a combat zone, the issue of personal hygiene is enough for almost any woman to
say “No, thank you.”
Then there are those who straddle the argument by pointing
out that, even if they could engage in combat, the majority of service women
would respectfully decline. The U.S. Marine Corps recently opened its Infantry
Officer Course to women, yet only 2 of 80 eligible females volunteered for the
course. If those two women were legally allowed to join their male counterparts
in combat, would the other 78 be forced into doing the same? A legal ruling
must also answer the question of whether women would also be required to
register for the draft.
By hearing this case, the Federal Court must answer two
questions: Should combat exemptions for women be lifted? And if they are lifted,
does that automatically mean that women will be sent to the front lines?
Perhaps the issue could be resolved simply in court by answering these
questions respectively with “Sure…if they want to.” A court ruling that women
be allowed in combat only on the condition that they volunteer to do so may
appease the women who feel that their constitutional rights are being violated.
Unfortunately, however, this opens the Pandora’s Box of other issues just
identified, which is by no means exhaustive.
Even if the battle is won in court, the U.S. government and
its organizations, especially the separate branches of military, are plagued
with bureaucracy. A win for the women
filing complaint will likely be followed with numerous other battles within
their particular branch of service. Standards, policy, attitudes, and culture
must be changed, which will result in years of negotiating and infighting.
After combatting the bureaucracy of the United States government, going head to
head with Al Qaida insurgents will seem like a Sunday picnic for these brave
female veterans.
No comments:
Post a Comment