To do this, Russia is using the following tactics to
influence foreign governments: (1) validating separatist mentalities, (2)
supporting opposition groups, and (3) deepening internal divisions. These
tactics will undermine strength and unity in foreign nations, comparatively making
Russia stronger.
Why these tactics? Because Russia has no chance of weakening
US or NATO hegemonic power through conventional means. As Politico states, “The Kremlin’s overall strategy to
dismantle the Western alliance is best encapsulated by a 2013 article in a
Russian military journal, where what’s since become known as the “Gerasimov
Doctrine” was laid down in writing. Adopting tactics of subterfuge
traditionally associated with “non-linear” or “hybrid” war, the doctrine calls
for the use of non-military over military measures by a four-to-one ratio, thus
allowing a conventionally weaker power like Russia (whose military budget is
one-tenth that of NATO’s) to fight asymmetrically by exploiting its
adversaries’ weaknesses.”
Low-level subversion or meddling in one country is
unacceptable, but affecting the internal makeup of dozens of western adversaries?
Truly scary. If these actions go unaddressed (or worse: unnoticed), they will collectively add up to a destabilized NATO, EU, etc. After all, “A West that is divided, inert and
unsure of its own basic values is not one that will resist Russia’s revisionist
agenda” (Politico).
Validating separatist mentalities
Using “automated social-network accounts” (bots) to propagate
“digital misinformation campaigns” (fake news), Russia has shown a determined
desire to interfere in international separatist movements.
In August of 2016, Moscow hosted a conference (funded in
part by the Russian government) that brought together leaders of foreign sucessionist
movements. Italian, Catalan, Basque, Northern Ireland, Scottish, Californian,
Texan, and Puerto Rican separatist groups met to discuss anti-globalism and separatist issues. It is important to note that Russia does not kindly entertain secessionist movements within its borders.
Supporting opposition and fringe groups
As is typical, the Kremlin is targeting leaders that would
be particularly tough on Russia (Hillary Clinton) and opting to support those
that may be more lenient towards Russia, and perhaps even lift sanctions
(Marine Le Pen, Donald Trump).
More interesting, however, the Kremlin is supporting fringe and
opposition groups, as well. This in order to diffuse the popular vote and thus weaken the
chances of the best-qualified candidate winning. Russia does this both through
financial and political support. This was evident when it was discovered Russia
bought Facebook ads in support of Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, and Donald Trump.
The ad bought in support of Jill Stein read, “Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein. Trust me. It’s not a wasted vote. … The only way to take our country
back is to stop voting for the corporations and banks that own us. #GrowaSpineVoteJillStein"
Looking to Europe, Russia is also supporting post-communist German Left party, the Italian Five Star movement, and many right-wing Euroskeptic groups that want to pull from the EU in favor of nationalism.
France’s far-right National Front Party admitted they received
$12.2 million in loans from a Kremlin-affiliated bank in 2014, according to
Bloomberg. And it asked for another loan of $27.7 million in February, the
report added.
Deepening internal division
If this isn't enough, the Kremlin is also exploiting the existing polarization of domestic US politics and trying to deepen the divide.
Recent news has come out that Russia purchased several
advertisements and authored posts that concerned current racial tension in the
US. Facebook has agreed to turn over 3,000 Russian-purchased advertisements. Some of these ads are supportive of groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter, while other ads pose these groups as a threat.
Russia may be using similar division tactics in other countries.
These activities beg the questions:
How do we categorize this aggression?
How do we defend against similar acts?
What is the appropriate response?
No comments:
Post a Comment