Here
in the aftermath of one of the most contentious and divisive elections in
modern memory, we can reflect on several firsts for our country. Among those is
the first hacking of a presidential candidate’s campaign and affiliated
national committee by a potentially government sponsored foreign hacking group.
There is little doubt that the targeted attacks of the Clinton campaign
originated in Russia, and that they were government sponsored. There is also
little doubt as to the reasoning behind the attacks. President Elect Trump made
numerous comments along the campaign trail that appear to reflect a more amenable
perspective on the Russians. It is pretty clear that Putin viewed Trump as the
preferable choice in our election.
Fast
forward to this month, and it would appear as though Russian hackers have moved
on to the next target group: academics
and think tanks. Given the important role that think tanks play in
Washington policy making and geopolitical understanding, it stands to reason
that our global rivals would want to now know what information their newly
elected executive is being fed. It is no secret that think tanks like Rand and
Brookings provide much of the background and analysis that our policy makers
then use to make major decisions. Hacking these organizations give these
foreign groups access to information, but also a means to distribute
misinformation while posing as a substantiated source.
Think
tanks have been used to influence policy on
behalf of big business in the past, and will likely continue to do so. They
represent excellent tools for decision makers who are pulled in numerous
directions. When you can’t be an expert on everything, you rely on the
perspectives of your trusted experts. In many cases, this is where the think
tank fits in. In an administration which may, in large part, be more
inexperienced in several arenas than its predecessors, these organizations may
yet have a larger role to play. What better way to sway decisions in your
favor? It’s worked before for others, why wouldn’t it work for a foreign
government?
That
is potentially the most important takeaway from the hacking story. Not only are
they accessing data, they are infiltrating networks and gaining access to
official emails, databases, and information portals. When everything is
vulnerable, can anything be trusted? First, our election was influenced by
foreign hacking. Now, it’s the very decisions made by our elected leaders. What’s
next?
No comments:
Post a Comment