Thursday, November 29, 2012

Saying 'So Long' to the Pipe: The Growth and Development of LNG


In the past decade we have seen a significant growth in liquified natural gas (LNG) technologies. The United States is developing techniques that can harness previously inaccessible reservoirs of natural gas. Exporters are developing new cargo containers and tankers to transport LNG across any terrain. All over Europe, states are allocating funds for the building of new LNG import and conversion facilities in order to handle the new medium. The demand for natural gas exports is not slowing down, and any technology that can deliver natural gas to markets quickly and more efficiently is essential. This discussion on LNG addresses how these developments in energy technology can have a significant influence in solving the security concerns of some states, and creating some for others.

The Technology

Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling are two primary technologies that are revolutionizing natural gas extraction. Reservoirs that were previously inaccessible due to technology or cost limitations are now economically reachable.  To see how these technologies are effective, observe the two well formations in Figure 1. The vertical wells are relatively easy to drill when extracting natural gas that lies horizontally in the ground, that is, as long as the gas doesn’t lie beneath dense rock formations. However, natural gas lying in vertical wells or beneath shale formations has historically been very difficult to access.  Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling tackle these extraction difficulties.

Using a pressurized liquid, such as water, hydraulic fracturing creates cracks in dense rock allowing drills to create wellbores that access the natural gas below it. After getting past the shale, wells can be drilled horizontally in order to extract vertical pipelines of natural gas more efficiently. In the past 10 years these technologies have become integrated into natural gas extraction techniques leading to the increase in U.S. production seen in Table 1.

Table 1: Natural Gas (NG) Consumption and Production
(Data acquired from the U.S. Energy Information Administration)
Year
Consumption (million cubic feet)
Production (million cubic feet)
% of U.S. NG consumption produced in the U.S.
2011
24,285,308
24,169,631
99.5%
2010
23,775,388
22,402,141
94.2%
2009
22,910,078
21,647,936
94.4%
2008
23,377,008
21,112,053
90.9%
2007
23,103,793
20,196,346
87.4%
2006
21,699,071
19,409,674
89.4%

Production of natural gas has also become more viable with the growth and development of LNG conversion, storage, and transport facilities. LNG sufficiently solves the transportation problems associated with natural gas. Previously only transportable by metal pipes, natural gas reservoirs could only be tapped if they were near markets. If pipes couldn’t reach the potential market, there was no other way for the natural gas to get there. However, with the growth in LNG technology, natural gas can be converted to liquid form by reducing the temperature to around -163°C, allowing it to be transported to any market. When converted to a liquid, natural gas also becomes 600 times denser, taking up less volume and making it easier to transport.

Policy and Politics

The United States hasn’t had the luxury of being a natural gas exporter for two reasons. First, as seen by Table 1, it consumes almost everything it produces. Second, even if the United States did have an abundance of natural gas to begin exporting, oceans separate the United States from the major markets in Europe and Asia. LNG technology removes distance and topography as an exporting constraint. As natural gas prices drop in the United States ($88 per mcm), companies will be looking to export to regions with higher prices in order to maintain healthy revenues (Europe - $409 per mcm; Japan- $589 per mcm). Where the United States decides to export could dramatically change politics and policy in that region.

For instance, Russia is a state that typically uses other states’ energy dependency as a political tool. Russia is currently the leader in natural gas production with the EU accounting for 44% of those exports.  As the EU looks to fulfill their Kyoto protocol obligations, and as many member states shift away from nuclear power after the Fukushima incident, Russia’s clean-burning natural gas looks like a very attractive energy alternative.

Russia is fully aware of the EU’s energy dependency, and is using it to facilitate technology transfers that will help modernize and grow the current Russian state. We have also begun to see Russia taking strategic action to increase EU energy dependency in order to strengthen their political leverage in the region. In 2002, Russia made a deal with Kazakhstan that allowed them full access to Russia’s gas transportation infrastructure. This causes them to be fully dependent on Russia for transporting their exports. Thus, no one gets Kazakh natural gas without going through Russia.  Russia has also been increasing natural gas imports from the Central Asian countries, allowing for more state-produced natural gas to be sold to Europe.

LNG technology will have the potential to diversify the European natural gas market and decrease dependency on Russia. The growth of LNG import and conversion facilities in Europe, the United States’ future role as an LNG exporter, and the spread of LNG technology to other producing regions in the Middle East, North Africa, and the South Pacific, is giving Europe more options for fulfilling their energy needs. More options equals less dependency on Russia. If Russia loses this dependency they will no longer have significant influence in European policy and politics.

With Europe’s dependency on Russian natural gas growing, it would be a strategic interest of the United States to try and provide alternatives for European energy demands. In doing so, the United States would be thwarting the ‘relationship of necessity’ developing between Europe and Russia. It would also eliminate one of the few cards Russia has to play in negotiating with Europe. If the United States manages to do this successfully, we will most likely see an increase in Russian aggression as they begin to feel their national security is being compromised.   

No comments: